The verdict on Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal server for her Secretary of State communications is in. Earlier this week FBI Director James Comey issued a detailed assessment of why charges will not be forthcoming — despite Clinton’s being “extremely careless.”
Sobering words those. “Extremely careless.” Appropriately said? However one might wonder if that is part of Comey’s job description, to offer opinions?
Unsurprisingly rival Donald Trump, in a Time magazine article, declared the decision “rigged” and hinted at “bribery.” House Speaker Paul Ryan told NBC, the verdict sets a “terrible precedent.”
Politico published a story about Hillary Clinton’s mixed blessings — and President Obama going the extra mile to stump for his one time rival at a Tuesday meeting in Charlotte, NC.
The AP Fact Check (that appeared in the Kansas City Star and elsewhere) examines Clinton’s past claims about not sending any classified material on her personal server — versus “The Facts: Actually, the FBI identified at least 113 emails that passed through her personal server and contained materials that were classified at the time they were sent . . . .”
Clinton, herself, appears to have nothing to say on the subject — something that one might find troubling in a potential future president. USA Today quoted Clinton’s campaign spokesman Brian Fallon as saying they were glad the matter was “now resolved.”
Resolved? But is it? Will voters care about this issue come November? Clinton has enormous political experience as a former Secretary of State and First Lady. Still ….
The New York Times Opinion page editorial board published an editorial that ended with:
“If there was ever a time that Mrs. Clinton needed to demonstrate that she understands the forthrightness demanded of those who hold the nation’s highest office, this is that moment.”
(C) 2016 by Mary Louise Van Dyke. All rights reserved.